7 years ago I was a post-baccalaureate student working on my
teaching certification at Texas Tech University. Everyone has to take a multicultural
class as part of the curriculum to become a teacher. I took mine in the summer
before my student teaching from a professor name Dr. Anderson. I don’t remember
much about the class, but I do remember liking it, liking Dr. Anderson and learning
that you should not judge a student based on the name on the roll, even if you
want to. So, in short, I didn’t learn much.
In one session of this class, my interest has already been
piqued. I am a current world geography teacher, a former US History teacher, and
I have a political science degree. So, last class was very interesting to me.
As a world geography teacher we talk a lot about what is
culture? What does it look like? What does it sound like? How can you define
it? How is it diffused? What part of it is diffused? It is a major part of my
curriculum. As a culminating culture unit project, my students must bring in a
cultural artifact and share it with the class, not unlike what we did last week
in our own class. It is always surprising to me what my students choose to
bring in as a class and last week was no less interesting. You learn a lot
about someone, rather quickly, by simply listening to them talk about a
cultural item they have chosen as the most important artifact in their culture.
It is fascinating to learn where people come from and where they are now.
I think that is history; learning about the past so we can
understand the future. I believe that is what we talked about in class last
week. We must learn about the past so we can understand where we are in
multicultural education and where we are going in multicultural education.
Beginning with Brown v. Board of Education, our country has
a rich, and troubling, history of multi-cultural education. As a history
person, it is important that we start with the facts of what happened and
discuss those first.
In the first selection of chapter 1 Joel Spring goes through
all the different forms of school segregation and cultural and linguistic
genocide that were central issues in the civil rights movement. (pg. 1) Through
this writing, we were able to begin to piece together the history of the civil
rights movements and the pieces of information that goes with them and remind
ourselves, or re-learn some key pieces of information that will help us
understand where we are going.
I am excited to get into more dialogue on the history of multicultural
education and where we are going in multicultural education.
I agree that you learn so much about a person with the cultural artifact assignment. I feel like I know so much more about everyone in our class and can understand their ideas and thoughts better by understanding who they are and where they come from. The same is true for the students that you teach. I think if you understand who your students are and where they come from you will have a better understanding of and greater respect for their thoughts and ideas. I do not particularly enjoy history class but I do agree with you that it is so important to know about the past to understand the future. I think it would be interesting if when history was taught it schools teacher related it to the future more often so it became relevant and interesting to the students.
ReplyDelete-Emily C
I can relate to your post-bac experience. I, too, took an undergraduate level multicultural education class with pretty much the same result. The teacher education programs don't typically give much practical knowledge. I didn't learn how to reach the students I shouldn't judge, I didn't learn anything to help me relate to them, and I didn't learn anything about their cultures. I think bringing culture into the curriculum as you have would be beneficial to me and to my students. You have some great ideas I can't wait to steal!
ReplyDelete